Legal Opinion

Deters v. Judicial Retirement & Removal Commission

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1994No. 93-SC-076-RRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

873 S.W.2d 200 (1994)

Jed K. DETERS, Appellant,

v.

JUDICIAL RETIREMENT AND REMOVAL COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 93-SC-076-RR.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

March 24, 1994.

Thomas Wesley Bosse, Deters, Benzinger & Lavelle, P.S.C., Covington, for appellant.

Jeffrey A. Darling, Lyon, Golibersuch & Darling, P.S.C., James D. Lawson, Executive Secretary, Judicial Retirement and Removal Com'n, Lexington, for appellee.

SPAIN, Justice.

Appellant was found by the Judicial Retirement and Removal Commission (Commission) to have twice violated Supreme Court Rule 4.020(1)(b)(v) and Canon 7 B(1)(c) of The Code of Judicial…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Monitor Patriot Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. In Re PrimusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Brown v. HartlageSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Ernest N. Morial v. Judiciary Commission of the State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API