Legal Opinion

Palladino v. Steen

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 11, 2013No. 98968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Palladino v. Steen,

2013-Ohio-1455.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98968 MARY C. PALLADINO PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. WADE STEEN, COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER DEFENDANT-APPELLEE JUDGMENT: REVERSED AND REMANDED Civil Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CV-779802 BEFORE: E.A. Gallagher, J., Keough, P.J., and E.T. Gallagher, J. RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: April 11, 2013 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT J. Alex Morton 5247 Wilson Mills Road Suite 334 Richmond Heights, Ohio 44143 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Timothy J.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Van De Hey v. Ashtabula Cty. Aud.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. 2188 Brockway, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Fiscal OfficerOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Simic v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API