Legal Opinion

North v. Alles

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 12, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Memorandum.—Suit for mechanics’lien. In the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge, presiding. Decree for defendants on intervening petitions; complainant brings the record here upon a writ of error. Heard in this court at the March term, 1893, and affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court,

Gary, P. J.

These writs of error are prosecuted to reverse decrees in mechanics’ lien cases, which decrees seem, from the records, to have been entered in favor of the defendants in error upon the intervening petitions, in a case wherein George Hendenbluth et al, were complainants, and P. H. Rudolph et al. were defendants.

The clerk certifies that what we have as the record in either case is “ a true, perfect and complete transcript of the record according to praecipe, filed and heretofore copied herein.”

Turning to that praecipe in each case, we find that it calls…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Meter's Heirs v. Lovis' HeirsIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Alling v. WenzellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  3. Atkinson v. Linden Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  4. Miller v. WhittakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Rowan v. BowlesIllinois Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tolman v. WheelerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API