Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Johnson-Kemnitz Drilling Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 5, 1943No. 31301PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, V. C. J.
By this appeal the plaintiffs in error Thompson, Wilmarth, and Routledge question the sufficiency of the sum awarded them by the judgment and decree of the district court in an action for accounting.
Thompson instituted the action, and defendants Wilmarth and Routledge, by separate pleadings, joined in his petition for accounting against the other defendants. Since there is no controversy between said plaintiffs in error, they will be referred to generally as plaintiffs.
The action sought a determination of plaintiffs’ rights as lot owners to participate with certain of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Ludey v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Moody v. WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Amis v. Bryan Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Parker v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- Edwards v. HardwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- McClain v. Ricks Exploration Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Denver Producing & Refining Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- EAGLE ENERGY PRODUCTION, L.L.C. v. THE CORPORATION COMMISSIONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- EAGLE ENERGY PRODUCTION, L.L.C. v. THE CORPORATION COMMISSIONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.