Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Brewer v. Laborfinders of Tampa

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 22, 2006No. 1D06-0228Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partErvin, J.

I concur with the majority in affirming all issues raised except that affirming the finding that claimant was represented by counsel at the time the release was executed, which resulted in the conclusion by the judge of compensation claims (JCC) that the validity of the release was controlled by the provisions of section 440.20(ll)(c), Florida Statutes (2003), relating to releases secured through the assistance of counsel, rather than those provided in section 440.20(ll)(b), pertaining to unrepresented claimants, which, unlike subsection (ll)(c) states, among other things, that a JCC shall…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DunmannSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Oldham v. RooksSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Torrey v. Leesburg Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Patco Transport, Inc. v. EstupinanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. Colby Materials, Inc. v. CALDWELL CONST.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API