Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dehler v. Kelly

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2010No. 2010-1229PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying an award of statutory damages to appellant, inmate Lambert Dehler, in a public-records mandamus case for the following reasons.

*310(¶ 2} First, Dehler refused to submit payment for the cost of the requested copies of public records. “R.C. 149.43 does not require a public-records custodian to provide copies of records free of charge; instead, the Public Records Act requires only that copies of public records be made available at cost.” State ex rel. Call v. Fragale, 104 Ohio St.3d 276, 2004-Ohio-6589, 819 N.E.2d 294, ¶ 6. Even though the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Dehler v. SpatnyOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Call v. FragaleOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Swain v. BartlesonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State ex rel. Galloway v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Horton v. Kilbane (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State ex rel. Ware v. Akron (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State ex rel. Carr v. London Correctional InstitutionOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State ex rel. Myers v. MeyersOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State ex rel. Grim v. New HollandOhio Supreme Court · 2024

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API