Legal Opinion

Anglo-American Commodities v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 3, 1961No. 65003; protests 198864-K, etc. (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., et al. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) As to all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to January 1, 1948, at 12% percent under paragraph 210, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T.D. 49753); (b) as to all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API