Legal Opinion
United States v. Dump Scows No. 116, No. 120 & No. 122
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 27, 1949No. Nos. 9741, 9742PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
We have given careful consideration to the questions presented by the appeals in the instant cases and have examined the authorities cited by the parties. Since the cases are in admiralty our consideration is of course de novo. Our conclusions, however, are the same as those expressed by Judge McGranery in his clear opinion, 77 F.Supp. 264, sub. nom. The Norwich Victory.
Accordingly the decree of the court below will be affirmed in all respects.
2Cited by13 opinions
- Petitions of the Kinsman Transit Company, as Owner and Operator of the Steamer MacGilvray Shiras, and of Midland Steamship Line, Inc., as Owner and Operator of the Steamer Michael K. Tewksbury, Their Engines, Etc., for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, City of Buffalo, Claimant-Respondent-Appellant, Kelley Island New York Corporation, Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- In re Kinsman Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Pasco Marketing, Inc., a Corporation v. Taylor Towing Service, Inc., a Corp., and Security Barge Line, Inc., a Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Sun Oil Company v. SS GEORGELDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- John I. Hay Co. v. the Allen B. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.