Legal Opinion
Mullaly v. Carlisle Chemical Works, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 2, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 58-59PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
Defendant’s present motion for summary judgment “dismissing the amended complaint” follows the denial of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment upon defendant’s counterclaim. See D.C.1959, 177 F.Supp. 588. The case was removed to this Court from the Superior Court of New Jersey upon diversity jurisdictional grounds.
Plaintiff was chief executive officer and a controlling stockholder of Advance Solvents & Chemical Corporation (Advance), a New Jersey corporation, which was acquired by defendant Carlisle Chemical Works, Inc., (Carlisle), an Ohio corporation a wholly…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mencher v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Mistretta v. S. S. Ocean EvelynDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964
- F. C. Kain v. Armour and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- F. C. Kain v. Armour and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966