Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 2001No. 3D00-2994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Maltimore Reynolds appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.

Defendant-appellant was sentenced under the 1995 sentencing guidelines. He contends that by virtue of Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), he is entitled to be resentenced under the 1994 guidelines. The trial court correctly ruled that defendant is not entitled to relief because his eight-year sentence falls within the 1994 sentencing guidelines. Accordingly, he is not entitled to be resentenced. See id. at 627.

We reject defendant’s arguments…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Clements v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Sanchez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Cook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Slachter v. SwansonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API