Legal Opinion
In re Quigley Co.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 24, 2013No. Case No. 04-15739 (SMB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chapter 11
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER REGARDING UNITED STATES TRUSTEE’S OBJECTIONS TO FEE APPLICATIONS
STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge:
The principal question presented by the final fee applications in this case is whether counsel are entitled to compensation for the work they did in proposing or supporting a plan that failed, inter alia, for lack of good faith. The United States Trustee (“UST”) filed objections on this and several other grounds to the final fee applications submitted by Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP (“Schulte”), attorneys for the debtor Quigley Company, Inc.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In Re Riverside-Linden Investment Co., Debtor. Ralph O. Boldt, Trustee Estes & Hoyt v. Kathryn Crake Earl HaferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In Re Lederman Enterprises, Inc., Debtor. Rubner & Kutner, P.C. v. U.S. Trustee Glen R. Anstine, Chapter 7 Trustee Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Tribeca Market, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- In re GSC Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In re 29 Brooklyn Avenue, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Frontier Communications CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Stephanie's Too, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2021