Legal Opinion

Wonderly v. Youngblood

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 8, 2022No. 1:16-cv-01621Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DARREN WONDERLY, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, 8 Plaintiff, 9 Case No. 1:16-cv-01621-BAK (SKO) 10 v. 11 SHERIFF DONNY YOUNGBLOOD and 12 DOES 1 through 50, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 13 Defendants. CONSOLIDATION FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES AND APPROVAL OF FLSA _____________________________________/ 14 SETTLEMENT 15 (Doc. 112) 16 MARK ASHLEY, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, 17 Plaintiff, 18 Case No. 1:16-cv-01638-BAK (SKO) 19 v. 20 SHERIFF DONNY YOUNGBLOOD and 21 DOES 1…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. In Re Mego Financial Corporation Securities Litigation Christopher Dunleavy A. Peyser v. Michael Nadler v. Robert Nederlander Jerome J. Cohen Herbert B. Hirsch Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. Deloitte & ToucheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API