Legal Opinion

American Preservers Co. v. Columbia Investment Co.

Superior Court of Buffalo

Decided March 15, 1894Published

Motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

The transaction between Tomes and defendant was an individual transaction, entirely independent of any business carried on by plaintiff, or of any matter which Tomes, as general manager, was authorized to do for it. Of this fact defendant was advised, or could have been so advised, if it had made inquiry. Making no inquiry, it stood chargeable with all the knowledge it would have obtained had it done so. When it took the check it knew that it was not Tomes’ check, but the check of plaintiff, for it so read. Consequently, it took it at its peril, and became liable-to plaintiff therefor for its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Alen v. . American National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Stephens v. . Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Gerard v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Gerard v. McCormickNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API