Constitution Life Insurance v. Rogerson
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
We will hereinafter refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court, where plaintiff in error was defendant and defendants in error were plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are husband and wife.
The action was instituted in the district court of Jackson county to recover the amount of premiums paid by plaintiffs on their applications for the issuance by defendant company of two policies of life insurance. The second amended complaint consisted of four separate counts, the first of which was based upon alleged false representations made by the agents of defendant company in procuring plaintiffs’…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Wade v. Olinger Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Cadez v. General Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Lincoln Liberty Life Insurance Company v. MartinezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- Cadez v. General Casualty Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Wade v. Olinger Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977