Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Georgia, Carolina & Northern Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 5, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Benet, J., Newberry, November, 1900. Action for personal injuries by Monroe Cooper against Georgia, Carolina and Northern Ry.

Read the full summary

Before Benet, J., Newberry, November, 1900. Action for personal injuries by Monroe Cooper against Georgia, Carolina and Northern Ry. Co. From- judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: There being no proof of negligence on part of defendant in stopping train, nonsuit should have been granted: 33 S. C., 201; 9 S. E. R., 129; 2 A. & E. R. Ca., 293; 56 S. C., 91. Invitation to get ready and get off, meant when train stopped: 5 Ency., 555, 565; 97 Ala., 332; 153 Mass., 490. Railroads do not insure safety of passengers under all circumstances: 27 S. C., 271 ; 20 S. C., 223; 58 S. C., 368;…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the 'Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The action herein is for damages in the sum of $10,000, alleged to have been’ sustained by the plaintiff at Whitmire, S. C., 14th November, 1897, by reason of the defendant’s negligence. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $1,500. The allegations of the complaint that are material to the consideration of the questions raised by the exceptions are:

“II. That the plaintiff, on the 14th day of November, 1897, purchased a ticket of the defendant at Carlisle, a station upon the railroad of the said defendant, said…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paul v. Salt Lake City Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Martin v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Sumner v. Grays Harbor Railway & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Davis v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  5. Dobson v. Receivers of S. A. L. Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API