Legal Opinion

United Bonding Insurance v. Minichiello

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 20, 1969No. K-421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANN, Associate Judge.

Is wall-to-wall carpeting real or personal property? It all depends. A careful analysis of the cases will reveal that the question is not what carpet is like, but what the parties intended, considering the demands of justice in the light of the interests to be balanced. Rectangular plates of steel not fastened in any way to the mill in which they formed the floor were held to be a fixture in Pyle v. Pennock, Pa.1841, 2 Watts & S. 390. Asked whether a plate of steel is personalty, the typical lawyer might quickly respond that it is, but the answer is that it depends on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Voorhis v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  2. Greenwald v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Joiner v. PoundNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Pyle v. PennockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  5. Fell v. MesseroffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strickland's Mayport, Inc. v. Kingsley BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. G E C C Leasing Corp. v. Berkshire Life InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API