Legal Opinion

Hartford Life Insurance v. Douds

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 9, 1923No. 265 and 271PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McRetnolds

These are separate causes, but the facts are similar and both present the same essential question. A statement based upon record No. 271 will suffice.

Petitioner is a Connecticut corporation with home office at Hartford. For many years it has carried on the business of insurance upon the assessment or mutual plan within the State of Ohio. May 4, 1882, it issued to respondent Langdale, aged forty, a certificate of membership, Safety Fund Department, for three thousand dollars. This recites that in consideration of representations, etc., and “ the further payment, in accordance with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hartford Life Insurance v. IBSSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Dresser v. Hartford Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  3. Frick v. Hartford Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. Frick v. Hartford Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McGuire v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  2. Reed v. Woodmen of the WorldMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Relief Assn. v. Assur. Soc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hastings v. MannDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1964
  5. Relief Ass'n of Union Works v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyOhio Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API