Legal Opinion

McCulla v. Brown

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 28, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is insisted that the circuit court erred in transferring the cause to equity, and likewise that the 'chancellor erred in not remanding to law, and also in sustaining the demurrer to the complaint. The relief sought was purely legal, an action for damages upon the statute allowing the injured party double damages for violation thereof. Rinehart & Gore v. Rowland, 139 Ark. 90, 213 S. W. 17. There was no ground for equitable relief alleged in the complaint nor in the defenses set up in the answer, consisting of specific denials of the allegations contained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coats v. MilnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Myers v. LinebargerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Rinehart & Gore v. RowlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. LeonardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. Sims v. Toler, JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Meyers Store Co. v. Colorado Milling & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. Berryman v. Cudahy Packing CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Sims v. Toler, JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API