Legal Opinion

Brown v. Giblet

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 24, 1933No. 21879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, filed their petition seeking $2,-500' damages. The trial court found against them, and on the 3rd day of November, 1930, plaintiffs perfected their appeal to this court.

Plaintiffs in error, in due time, served and filed their brief in compliance with the rules, of this court, but the defendants in. error have wholly failed to file any brief, pleading, or any (other instrument in said1 cause on appeal, nor have they offered any excuse for their failure to do so. Under this condition of the case, this court is not required to1 search the record to find…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City National Bank v. CoatneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. KentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Argo Oil Co. v. SnoufferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. DonaheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. LungerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Wood Oil Co. v. EndicottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API