Legal Opinion
Pinchera v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 1968No. 10926PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AYRES, Judge.
Plaintiff Mrs. Katherine Pinchera, having allegedly sustained accidental injuries within the course and scope of her employment with the defendant, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., and her husband, George D. Pinchera, instituted this action for a declaratory judgment to determine whether Mrs. Pinchera’s remedy was through an action for workmen’s compensation or in tort with an appropriate award in accordance with the court’s determination of the nature of defendant’s liability.
The court, after trial, discounted the fact that plaintiff Mrs. Pinchera experienced an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Byas v. Hotel Bentley, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Talbot v. Trinity Universal Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Richmond v. Weiss & Goldring, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Carter v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Viator v. New Hotel Monteleone, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fabre v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Fontenot v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human ResourcesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Fontenot v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Humphries v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.