Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Shapmar Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 1943PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

There were two causes of action — one for damages for personal injuries sustained by infant plaintiff, Richard Reilly, and the other for loss of services by his mother, Dorothy Reilly. It is claimed that on April 29, 1941, while the infant plaintiff was in front of a building owned and controlled by defendant at 53 St. Marks Place, New York City, a heavy ornamental flower pot, located on a post in front, fell on the infant. There is no dispute that the infant’s injuries were severe and required his hospitalization for seventy-five days, for which alone there was incurred a $532 hospital bill.

A…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gray v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Reilly v. RawleighAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Hill v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  4. Warner v. PruettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Leonard v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API