Legal Opinion

In Re LaBrum & Doak, LLP

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1998No. 19-11544PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID A. SCHOLL, Chief Judge.

A INTRODUCTION

Presently before us for determination in the contentious Chapter 11 case of LAB-RUM & DOAK, LLP (“the Debtor”), a dissolved law firm, are certain Objections to the Liquidating Plan of Reorgani2iation (“the Plan”) proposed by the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (“the UC Committee”). The principal objections are these of former partners contending that the Plan improperly classifies their claims subordinate to the claims of general unsecured creditors and that the Plan improperly gives the UC Committee itself broad post-confirmation…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Route 37 Business Park AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Robinson v. WangemannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  3. In Re 222 Liberty AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. In Re Riverside-Linden Investment Co., Debtor. Estes & Hoyt, a Professional Corporation Ralph O. Boldt, Trustee v. Kathryn Crake Earl HaferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. In re Jersey City Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Labrum & Doak v. Ashdale (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Labrum & Doak v. Bechtle (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API