Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Department of Highways v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1953No. Appeal, No. 33PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The proceedings which gave rise to this appeal had their beginning in December 1951 when Pittsburgh Railways Company applied to the Public Utility Commission, under §202 of the Public Utility Law of May 28, 1937, P. L. 1053, as amended, 66 PS §1122, for leave to abandon its street railway service on a portion of “Route 2 — Etna” and “Route J — Millvale” between the intersection of East Ohio Street and Troy Hill Road in the City of Pittsburgh, and the boroughs *583of Etna and Millvale. Concurrently with the above applications the Railways Company also sought approval of its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. West Penn Railways Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. West Penn Railways Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Gannon v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Railways Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Milavech v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. City of St. Paul v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API