Legal Opinion

Clavette v. Sweeney

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 30, 2001No. CV 99-884-BRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BROWN, District Judge.

This action comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# 26) and Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding James P. Morgan (# 44). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTS Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The following facts are undisputed except when otherwise noted. At 1:00 a.m. on August 29, 1998, the Portland Bureau of Emergency Communications (BOEC) received a 9-1-1 call reporting a house…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
  2. Blomdahl v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  3. Glass v. Lake CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
  4. Jared Lee Hawkins v. Wellpath Liquidating Trust; Jane Doe; and Kelly DoeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
  5. Johnson 151089 v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API