Legal Opinion
KORPONAI v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 9, 2012No. A12A0336PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction for less-safe DUI, Sandor Kor-ponai argues that the trial court erred when it charged the jury on implied consent and that trial counsel was ineffective. We find no error and affirm.
“On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, with the defendant no longer enjoying a presumption of innocence.” Reese v. State, 270 Ga. App. 522, 523 (607 SE2d 165) (2004). We neither weigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses, but determine only whether, after viewing the evidence in the light…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Suggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Reese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- DeYoung v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MACMASTER v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Coghlan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Donna J. Coghlan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013