Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Heirs & Devisees of T.D. Lovercheck

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2015No. S-14-529PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

-9- Nebraska A dvance Sheets 291 Nebraska R eports FISHER v. HEIRS & DEVISEES OF T.D. LOVERCHECK Cite as

291 Neb. 9

David Fisher and Pamela W. Fisher, husband and wife, and David Fisher and Pamela W. Fisher, Trustees, appellants, v. The H eirs and Devisees of T.D. Lovercheck et al., appellees. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed June 5, 2015. No. S-14-529. 1. Equity: Appeal and Error. On appeal from an equity action, an appel- late court tries factual questions de novo on the record and reaches an independent conclusion. 2. Statutes: Appeal and Error. The meaning and interpretation of a statute are questions…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Morton v. GTE Southwest Inc. (Wieburg)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Ruth Crowder, Mother and Next Friend of Walter Paul Crowder and David Douglas Crowder, Minors v. Gordons Transports, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  4. Esposito v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holloway v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Baumgart v. O'Sullivan (In Re Estate of Karmazin)Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Echo Group v. Tradesmen Internat.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. In re Estate of KarmazinNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API