Legal Opinion

Bank v. . McNair

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, the United States National Bank of New York, brought its action against the defendants to recover the sum of $5,000 due by the defendants to it on a promissory note which the defendants, McNair Pearsall, under date of 19 November, 1891, had executed to the First National Bank of Wilmington, N.C. for the sum of $5,000, and payable thirty days after its date, and which said note the said First National Bank of Wilmington had indorsed to the plaintiff for value and before maturity, as plaintiff alleges.

The defendants, McNair Pearsall, by their answer admitted that the said note…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Boyden v. President of the BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  3. Mann v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. United States National Bank of New York v. McNairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Ragsdale v. Meridian Land & Industrial Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bland v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1916
  2. First National Bank v. McNairySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Branham v. Drew Grocery Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State Planters Bank v. Courtesy Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API