Legal Opinion · Dissent

Agar School District No. 58-1 v. McGee

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1997No. 19593Published

1DissentMiller, Chief Justice

[¶ 30.] I dissent. A declaratory judgment action is a recognized method for seeking a refund of an illegal tax. Our holdings in Arneson v. Baker, 76 S.D. 262, 266, 77 N.W.2d 325, 326-27 (1956), and Agar School Dist. No. 58-1 v. McGee, 527 N.W.2d 282, 286-87 (S.D.1995) (Agar I), expanded the narrow circumstances in which a tax refund may be allowed to include not only the exclusive statutory methods provided by the protest and suit statute, SDCL 10-27-1, and the refund and abatement statutes, SDCL 10-18-1 and -2, but also to include declaratory *325judgment actions. The inclusion of declaratory…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Agar School District 58-1 Board of Education v. McGeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. First W. Bank, Sturgis v. Livestock YardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Western States Land & Cattle Co. v. Lexington Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. American State Bank v. List-MayerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API