Legal Opinion

Miller v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, George Miller, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Orange Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Orange on the 21st day of February, 1898, denying the plaintiff’s motion for a retaxation of the costs.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

On the original trial of this action the plaintiff was given a verdict. Fiurn the judgment entered, the defendants appealed to the General Term, where the judgment was affirmed, with costs. On *350motion of the defendants a reargument was ordered, and on this reargument the' j udgment was. reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.. • On the retrial the jury again found for the plaintiff, who, in taxing his costs, inserted items of twenty dollars before argument and forty dollars for argument on both arguments before the General Term. The items charged on the first…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Fourth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Willard v. HarbeckNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Slocum v. LansingNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Sweet v. ChapmanNew York Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. Schwartz v. RibaudoCity of New York Municipal Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API