Stuch v. Town
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Allegan; Cross, J. Case by LaFayette F. Stuch against Frank Town for damages to plaintiff’s automobile. Judgment for defendant upon a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
On January 9, 1913, plaintiff was the owner of an automobile. His son had driven it upon the streets of the city of Allegan and had left it standing in proper position near the sidewalk in front of plaintiff’s office. The automobile was not, at the time, equipped with a license plate for the year 1913, .as required by subsection 1 of section 3, Act No. 318, *478Public Acts of 1909 (2 How. Stat. [2d Ed.] § 2487). Upon the same day defendant was the owner of a team of horses, which were being driven by one Gar-ton, an employee of defendant, upon the streets of said city. The team was young and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Chase v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Doherty v. Inhabitants of AyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Hughes v. Atlanta Steel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spencer v. Phillips & TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1917