Legal Opinion

Norwich Union Fire Insurance v. Standard Drug Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the chancery court of Lauderdale county. Hon. G-. C. Tann, Chancellor. Suit by the Standard Drug Company against the Norwich Fire Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, J.,

delivered the .opinion of the court.

Appellee,' ‘Standard Drug Company, sued in equity to recover from appellant one thousand five hundred dollars, statutory penalties under section 500, Code of 1906, and chapter 250, Acts of 1912, section 3289, Hemingway’s Code; and also to recover back certain alleged overcharges on premiums exacted by appellant on three fire insurance policies. A. demurrer was interposed to the original bill, the demurrer confessed, and thereafter the bill was amended. To the bill as amended the defendant interposed three demurrers.. It is conceded that one of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. LockhartMississippi Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Hentz v. Delta BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Fall v. HafterMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Sledge v. DicksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Norwich Union Fire Ins. v. Standard Drug Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  2. White v. PriceMississippi Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API