Legal Opinion

State v. McMullin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1974No. 7421SC501PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the admission of the in-court identification of the defendant by the witness Michael Mitchell. Upon objection, a voir dire was conducted. The witness testified that he had known defendant prior to this occasion, having seen him around this same intersection about every other weekend. However, the witness knew defendant only by his first name, Frank; he knew defendant’s brother only by his first name, Willie. He told the investigating officers that Frank did the cutting. Willie was arrested at the scene, but Frank ran. The police showed the witness…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Rutherford v. Bass Air Conditioning Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. BeamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. IngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API