Erie-Lackawanna Railroad Company v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1DissentWeinfeld, District Judge
(dissenting) :
I am of the view that the reeision of one of the conditions and the reopening for further consideration of the other conditions originally imposed by the *982Commission for the protection of the three carrier plaintiffs, the Erie-Lacka-wanna (E-L), Delaware & Hudson (D&H) and Boston & Maine (B&M), (the protected carriers), as a prerequisite to the consummation of the merger requires the granting of the interlocutory injunction.
The elimination in advance of the merger of a substantial “term and condition” and the reopening of others, all of which the Commission itself deemed…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.