National Presto Industries, Inc.

Pleading and practice; review of interlocutory order; failure to satisfy standards of Rule 53(c)(2)(ii). — On December 14, 1979 the court entered the following order:

Before Davis, Judge, Presiding, Kashiwa and Bennett, Judges.

The underlying litigation, which has not yet come to trial, is a renegotiation case involving plaintiffs’ fiscal years 1967-1972. During that period National Presto produced 105mm and 8-inch projectiles for the Army, using the "hot cup, cold draw” process. Plaintiffs intend to claim favorable consideration under the statutory renegotiation factors for having developed…