Legal Opinion

City of Pekin v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1930No. 19613. Judgment reversedPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant in error, Hulda Strope, the widow and administratrix of the estate of John Strope, deceased, on June 2, 1926, filed her claim for compensation against plaintiff in error, the city of Pekin, on account of the death of her husband, she being the only person dependent upon him for support. There was a hearing before an arbitrator, who made an award against plaintiff in error. On review the Industrial Commission set aside the award, and found that while the deceased on January 1, 1926, sustained an accidental injury which resulted in his death, the injury did not arise out of and in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Jacobs v. CoffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Kenneally v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hughes v. TraegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. People v. BrautiganIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. City of Chicago v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Welch v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hazen v. National Rifle Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Alvey v. BrighamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. People Ex Rel. Warren v. ChristianWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  5. County of Cook v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API