Legal Opinion

Zeilda Forsee Investment Co. v. St. Joseph Gas Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. — Mon. Thomas B. Allen, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, J.

The áppeal herein is from the action of the trial court in sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition. It was filed February 19, 1916, and alleged that defendant was a public service corporation engaged in supplying gas for domestic consumption in St. Joseph, Mo., by means of pipe-lines in the streets, under a franchise granted to it by said city; that prior to 1907, defendant made extensions of its gas mains at its own expense, it, at that time, supplying artificial *373gas at $1 per 1000 cubic feet; but that in tbe year 1907 it ceased supplying artificial gas and began furnishing natural gas…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lukrawka v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lawrence v. RichardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
  3. Watson v. FrenchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  4. Minneapolis General Electric Co. v. City of MinneapolisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Smith v. Capital Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Levitt v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API