Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lighteard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 23, 1999No. 190-99PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1DissentMcCORMICK, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent to the Court’s decision to refuse the State’s discretionary review petition. The Court of Appeals decided the government violated appellant’s Fourteenth Amendment federal constitutional “due process” rights under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Ake v. Oklahoma1 as interpreted by this Court in De Freece v. State.2

The Court of Appeals decided the government did this when the trial court denied appellant’s last minute trial-date request for a continuance and for appointment of another “defense” psychiatrist to assist appellant in the preparation of an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. De Freece v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Lighteard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joshua Paul Calhoun v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API