Legal Opinion

Baysden v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 2011No. COA11-395PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Plaintiff Walter Sutton Baysden appeals from an order rejecting his challenge to the constitutionality of the Felony Firearms Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-415.1 et seq., both facially and as applied to the facts surrounding his personal situation. More specifically, Plaintiff argues that the Felony Firearms Act violates his right to bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution as made applicable to the States by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Sections 19 and 30 of the North…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Craig Ex Rel. Craig v. New Hanover County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  3. In Re Appeal of the Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Nunn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  5. Carcano v. JBSS, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnston v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. People v. MartinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  3. State v. BonetskyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. People v. RushAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  5. Archie v. Old Salem TavernNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API