Legal Opinion · Dissent

People ex rel. Marsh v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 12, 1954Published

1DissentKimball, J.

I dissent from the conclusion reached by the majority that the rule laid down in People v. Olah (300 N. Y. 96) requires a reversal in this case. The court said in People v. Love (305 N. Y. 722): “ This is not a situation encompassed by our decision in People v. Olah ”, The situation in the instant case is parallel to that in the Love case. Unlike the New Jersey statute considered in the Olah case, the Utah statute, defining second degree burglary, sets forth two different ways of committing the crime. One way is where a person “ forcibly breaks and enters.” The other, set forth in the statute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. OlahNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. State v. BeckendorfUtah Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API