Legal Opinion

Dofflemyer v. Director

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 8, 1965No. [App. No. 68, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

237 Md. 639 (1965)

206 A.2d 703

DOFFLEMYER

v.

DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION

[App. No. 68, September Term, 1964.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 8, 1965.

Before HAMMOND, HORNEY, MARBURY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.

2Per curiam

This application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief contains no statement of reasons, as required by Maryland Rule BK 46 b, and must be dismissed on that ground. Mullen v. Director, 236 Md. 640, 204 A.2d 555 (1964).

Application denied.

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mullen v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Campion v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Taylor v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Buettner v. Superintendent of the Maryland Correctional Institution for WomenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Coleman v. Warden of the Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Thompson v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API