Legal Opinion
Shuttlesworth v. Gaylord
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided November 8, 1961No. Civ. A. 9505PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
GROOMS, District Judge.
This matter came on for hearing on the merits on October 24, 1961. All parties were represented by counsel. Upon motion duly made, Raiford Ellis and King Sparks, Jr., were stricken as party defendants upon the grounds that both defendants were no longer employed in any capacity by the City of Birmingham or in the capacity as alleged in the complaint. The Court also granted plaintiffs’ motion to substitute Frank A. Wagner as a party defendant in place of King Sparks, Jr., the said Frank A. Wagner being the present acting…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Cooper v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Mayor of Baltimore City v. DawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- City of Montgomery, Alabama v. Georgia Theresa GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Lawrence v. HancockDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of the State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Cobb v. Montgomery Library BoardDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1962
- Willie v. Harris County, TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1962
- Randall v. Sumter School District Number 2, Sumter, South CarolinaDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1964
- Smith v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMADistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.