Legal Opinion
Franzese v. United Health Care/Oxford
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 5, 2017No. 14-cv-1902 (SJF)(AKT)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEUERSTEIN, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Robert Franzese and Elizabeth Franzese, as the parents and legal guardians of Robert Franzese Jr., a disabled adult (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), commenced this action against Defendant United Health Care/Oxford (“Defendant” or “Oxford”) seeking to recover medical benefits pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1144(a). See Docket Entry (“DE”) [1]. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, which Plaintiffs oppose. DE [41], [41-21].…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weinreb v. Xerox Bus. Servs., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. v. Motherly Love Home Care Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Pellegrino v. First Unum Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
- Vellano v. The Standard Life Insurance Company of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020