Legal Opinion

Rajic v. Sarokin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 17, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover a down payment for the purchase of real estate, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.), entered September 10, 1993, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to discharge a notice of pendency in a separate action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

"[A] notice of pendency may be filed in any action * * * in which the judgment demanded would affect the title to, or the possession, use or enjoyment of, real property”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Interboro Operating Corp. v. Commonwealth Security & Mortgage Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Tsiporin v. ZiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shkolnik v. KrutoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API