Brinson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STERLING HUTCHESON, District Judge.
No. 558
This action was brought by the two surviving children of Ernest Brinson, deceased, who at the time of his death was the holder of an insurance policy, issued by the defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, under the pro*95visions of what is known as the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Act of 1954. The third party defendant claims the proceeds of the policy as the surviving widow of Ernest Brinson.
Metropolitan has deposited in the registry of this court the proceeds of the policy with interest due thereon.
Both the plaintiffs Ernest Ray…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bertha Tatum v. Oscar TatumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Parker v. American Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Willie Brantley v. Edward J. Skeens, Guardian Ad Litem, Herbert Mathis v. Edward J. Skeens, Guardian Ad LitemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- United States v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Baumet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mitchell v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Woolery v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1976
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. DulekDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1980