Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 8, 1961No. [No. 47, September Term, 1961.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

These are four appeals in one record from judgments and sentences entered after a jury found the appellants guilty of robbery with a dangerous and deadly weapon. The State has moved to dismiss the appeals of Boyd, Toland and Williams, on the ground that they failed to present in the record extract sufficient material to enable this Court to decide certain of the questions presented. But it is conceded that at least some of the points raised are properly before us and entitled to consideration. For this reason the motion to dismiss will be denied.

At about 1:30 A.M. on April 11, 1960, an armed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Mulcahy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Vincent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Judy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Day v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Veney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Kardy v. SHOOK, J.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Eiland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API