Legal Opinion

Wittman v. Koenig

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 26, 2016No. 15-2798PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is how to apply a Wisconsin statute that exempts from the assets available to creditors to execute judgments a debtor’s annuity contract that “complies with the provisions of the internal revenue code.” See Wis. Stat. § 815.18(3)(j)2.a. The Wisconsin statute does not specify which of the Internal Revenue Code’s provisions (codified in Title 26 of the United States Code) an annuity must comply with to qualify for an exemption. But the statute does require us to construe the exemption to “secure its full benefit to debtors.” Wis. Stat. §…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Schill v. Wisconsin Rapids School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Police Ass'n v. FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Joseph Brown v. Jeffrey KempCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  3. Cranberry Growers Cooperative v. Patrick LayngCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Helms v. Metro. Life Ins. Co. (In re O'Malley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Protect Our Parks, Inc. v. Chi. Park Dist.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API