Legal Opinion
Howell v. Consol. Rail Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 20, 2017No. 104554PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANITA LASTER MAYS, J.:
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellants, Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Consolidated"), America Premier Underwriters, Inc. and its predecessors in interest and/or liability ("APU"), and CSX Transportation, Inc. ("CSX"), (collectively "appellants") appeal the trial court's denial of their motion for administrative dismissal of the complaint of plaintiff-appellee Kevin E. Howell ("Howell") for failure to meet the prima facie requirements of the Ohio Asbestos Reform Act, promulgated under H.B. 292 and codified at R.C. 2307.91 through 2307.98 ("Ohio Act") for a smoker raising an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Jamison v. EncarnacionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bartel v. Farrell Lines, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Howell v. Consol. Rail Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Howell v. Consol. Rail Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Howell v. Consol. Rail Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017