Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Hitchcock

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1887PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Ionia. (Smith, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinions.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, O. J.

In this case the controlling facts found are these:

In 1873, Thomas J. Hitchcock came to Michigan, leaving behind him, in New York, a wife, Caroline Hitchcock, and two minor children. The wife knew of his coming, and expected at some time to join him, but was never in Michigan. In March, 1875, Hitchcock bought a vacant lot, and subsequently built on it. Whether he began to build or not before his second marriage does not appear, but the house was finished thereafter.

In December, 1875, he, without divorce from his previous wife, married defendant, who married him in good faith,…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Whelan v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Gluc v. KleinMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. In Re Estate of Van MeterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  4. Michelman v. FryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Croker v. CrokerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API