Legal Opinion
Dianne Craig, Claimant-Appellant v. M/v Peacock, on the Complaint of Oscko Edwards, Harry M. Tompkins, Fairfield Industries
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 14, 1985No. 83-2023Published
1Opinion of the Court
760 F.2d 953
1986 A.M.C. 2565
Dianne CRAIG, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
M/V PEACOCK, on the Complaint of Oscko EDWARDS, Harry M.
Tompkins, Defendants-Appellees.
Fairfield Industries, Defendant.
No. 83-2023.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 10, 1984.
Decided May 14, 1985.
Henry D. Dicum, John E. Droeger, Hall, Henry, Oliver & McReavy, San Francisco, Cal., for claimant-appellant.
Graydon S. Staring, Ann Miller, Matthew P. Vafidis, Lillick, McHose & Charles, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- West v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.