Legal Opinion

Orth v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 28, 1942PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiffs seek to restrain the defendants from using the name “Million Dollar Legs” in connection with any motion picture or play and for an accounting of profits and damages, on the ground that the plaintiffs had first written and produced a “short play” bearing that title, and that the defendants are competing unfairly with the plaintiffs. The bill is not based upon infringement of copyright.

The cause was referred to a master to “find the facts upon the question of liability of the defendants or either of them” and “upon such determination” to file his report and to await the further…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Underhill v. . SchenckNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Romanausky v. SkutulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Hutchins v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. International Film Service Co. v. Associated Producers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  5. Barnes v. BarnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Foreign Auto Import, Inc. v. Renault Northeast, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Vincent v. PleckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Pierce's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Slater v. MunroeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API